Decisions,
De-Risked.
Feasibility, risk, valuation and carbon — scored and ready to act on.
Intelligence means nothing if you can't act on it. These services turn FHIP research into decision artefacts: reports, APIs, recommendations. One score. Clear next steps.
Parramatta Site A
Five Services. One Question Each.
Decision artefacts built on our foundation models.
Development Feasibility
- →Feasibility score (0–100 scale)
- →Detailed site assessment (soils, constraints)
- →Construction cost estimate
- →Timeline estimate with confidence bands
- →Risk flags (supply chain, climate)
Risk & Defect Assessment
- →Hazard identification (site, design, construction)
- →Probability scoring (0–100% likelihood)
- →Cost impact range scenarios
- →Mitigation strategies from similar projects
Valuation & Market Analysis
- →Market demand outlook (5–10 yr)
- →Comparable property analysis
- →Absorption outlook
- →Scenario & sensitivity analysis
Carbon & Energy Assessment
- →Embodied carbon score (kg CO₂-e/m²)
- →Operational carbon annual emissions
- →Compliance check vs Scope 3 mandates
- →Certification pathways (5-Star / Net-Zero)
Opportunity Intelligence
- →Opportunity scoring (feasibility + demand)
- →Market gap analysis
- →Site recommendation engine (top 10 matches)
- →Competitive landscape timelines
Approvable. Buildable. Bankable.
A site only stacks up when all three hold. We test each one on evidence — then say so plainly.
Approvable
Will the consent authority approve it — and how long will it take? Assessment pathway, overlays, referrals and notification, read at register scale before design starts.
Buildable
Can it actually be delivered to program and cost? Layout, staging, materials and trade sequencing checked against how the group builds today.
Bankable
Does the money work? The full development priced line by line — margin on cost, and how it holds when the sale price moves.
The whole project, priced before you commit.
A feasibility is arithmetic with consequences. Our model prices the whole development — acquisition, statutory charges, construction, finance and sales — line by line, then reports net profit, margin on cost, and what happens when the sale price moves ±8%. Press play to watch a project price itself.
- Acquisition
- Statutory
- Construction
- Finance & holding
- Sales
Illustrative model — indicative line items and sensitivity, shown to demonstrate the method, not a live project appraisal.
Here's What An Illustrative Report Looks Like.
A sample structure of our feasibility reports. Data-driven, structured, transparent methodology, 30–40 pages. You get a number you can act on, not just an opinion.
IllustrativeRequest A Sample
Simple Pricing.
| Service | Cost | Delivery |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility Report | By engagement | 5 days |
| Risk Assessment | By engagement | 7 days |
| Valuation & Market | By engagement | 5 days |
| Carbon & Energy | By engagement | 3 days |
| Bundle (Feas+Risk+Val) | By engagement | 10 days |
Every report states what it does not do.
A report you can rely on is one that names its own boundaries. Ours do — on the first page, not in the fine print.
It prices the asset in its market. It does not promise what you will make from it.
Where development costs are excluded, the report says so instead of implying they were modelled.
Figures come from recorded data, not assumed dimensions — and the source is named.
Each report carries the model’s confidence and the data coverage behind it.
It is decision intelligence. Where a formal valuation is required, we say so.
Feasibility reports draw on verified transaction records across metropolitan South Australia. The model is not where projects are lost — the boundaries are, which is why every report names them.
Get Started With A Report.
Tell us about your project — we confirm scope, delivery dates and pricing at kick-off.
Or Talk To Someone:
If you need custom work, an annual retainer, or have specific questions about our methodology.
Book a 30-min consultation- ✓Invoice or PO sent
- ✓Kick-off call with analyst
- ✓Report delivered on schedule